http://www.ecrans.fr/Dumas-en-noir-et-blanc, 9213.html
Question, alone, naked, spread shamelessly on the palanquin of immaculate grandeur real social debate, burning lips now all dinner parties and other hacks of Nanard scribouillage journos. Immense in its depth, unfathomable in the extended fields it opens: "Gerard Depardieu - white - can it (he morally right in the Kantian sense) to play Alexandre Dumas - mulatto -?"
[modifying phrase intends connasses thurifieraires all the "protection of minorities" and other destroyers of weak national debate guilt, the word mulatto is nothing pejorative, I prefer for obvious reasons register language (again I know it's wrong, I do not mean a bloke from kom lieuban p'tain tro mdr) under "individual belonging to minorities Metis" or "national representative of miscegenation," which like 95% of your word , gives me nausea and vertigo of emptiness - the Remaining 5% being generally a maelstrom of basic words to express hunger, thirst or desire to vote in all cases which are similar to natural needs]
Let's get back to basics. A white actor can interpret a mulatto? So, sorry but without striking a blow, footstool ottoman, putting an end to all debates shaking the last three nights Chow Parisianism appendages between capillary type fatty Liberation journalist or wax-type pump Sarkozian scratch-free paper Le Figaro obituary, I say ... to shock, I realize, I almost tremble to express this opinion: YES. Finally as a bit since the Ancient Greece or the term actor epitomizes this possibility. This applies even when the beautiful Andromache may still even be played by my cousin Marie-Josee which has a slightly overweight (she is bouboule, sorry, "round" hello to you, O faithful reader of the MLF). Or when we are not asking to most of Mimi or Violetta lose 75kgs before spitting their lungs in the last small arm muscles of their frail romantic partners on the scenes of Covent Garden and La Scala. I said to myself after having taken the risk of this response Osee, after it says YES brave the debate can not be so stupid. Or as this institute has a very fine and totalitarian regime ecarrir all traces of a culture because what good is thinking 5000 years to get there? No, for the benefit of the doubt of Western man I I say the debate should be elsewhere. I think, made me shudder, I weave, I m'affale in a chair, I scratch my neck ... and suddenly ... illumination: the question apaprait. The only, not the Successives, another, more relevant:
Gerard Depardieu - white - can it (he morally right in the Kantian sense) to play Alexandre Dumas - mulatto - without running afoul of guilt on contemporary of these representatives of the small Hell navel mass and lack of Ideas like a factory GENERATE cesspool? " Who is Audrey Pulvar? Which is the type of Navarro (we said "mulatto" o you who is the scene and plot that Carrefour is the small business district, not "mules" as said Roger Hanin)? But Who are these people asking for this debate? On what? What does it advance? We must play by Dumas only N'Gouma Julie Lescaut? Herve Bourges and you finally do but you really justify your salary by stirring plate that you train on that stupid debate? Should we ultimately do not play Robin Hood as a fan of tights? Should we just play by Heidi a fat dairy Helvete in heavy, probably too courrir gaily in the Vaud mountains without wallowing cons Milka cow? Should we not offer large lianas's Avatar cyanotic?? Not really but when we realize that these debates are turds that leprosy symptoms of this self-flagellation that devours contemporary societies and that "the rights of all to all" is a straight line to the death of the Right for everyone? But finally, when was the reaction against such aberrations or we troll the collective guilty conscience maintained by grubs writhing on the corpse of the Nation, the cohesion of the people, spewing their vile mush communitarian in all corners of public debate even the most absurd like this??
0 comments:
Post a Comment