What political show ... sad Leading Socialist who refuses to debate a subject that is not at its height, and leaders who s'étripent back to May 68, Stalinism and World War II to crush the other, a minister and a cornered frontist which plays the diabolically register of emotion and common sense peasant.
We would want any mess. Forget the chaos of words and cartoons, and think about his business. Escape ... But basically it would be an admission of helplessness unbearable.
What about this? Consider the questions one by one ...
1 / The public is also right to broadcast a debate on national identity with political leaders? It is his mission.
2 / A discussion between the Minister of Immigration and the National Front? Democracy should refrain debate. That the most extreme positions are simplistic or face their contradictions are acclaimed and best.
3 / lurch premeditated Vincent Peillon? Incorrect with respect to the chain, incomprehensible from a leader who is supposed defend ideas, even the most sensitive subjects, even in the most difficult environments. Do not bring the conflict to the Front National is outrageous, avoid his opponent is loose.
What I take from all this ...
The problem is not the debate as such, nor the people, but the conditions under which it was made, a cacophony of insane rage leads to nothing. They were reduced to three words always put more simplistic and they are allowed to interrupt incessantly.
short, we should give time to speak each, and ... cut the microphone of others!
0 comments:
Post a Comment